data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e41cb/e41cba8cc0ece8646964a1ed7931c735c27b1ee3" alt=""
Below is my response in the Manteca Bulletin regarding his opinion letter.
This Blog is used for commenting and responding to the Manteca newspapers and newsworthy items related to Manteca including politics. It is also used for just about anything on my mind worthy of mentioning.
Parents, keep your children home on Harvey Milk Day
SaveCalifornia.com calls for boycott of sexual indoctrination in K-12 schools
"Fathers and mothers are angry about Harvey Milk Day pushing this extreme, perverse role model upon their kids," said SaveCalifornia.com President Randy Thomasson. "Children belong to parents, not to the state! Since SB 572 has no opt-out, boycotting Harvey Milk Day and pulling their children out of the imploding government school system is the only way for parents to protect their girls and boys."
The boycott will also send a strong message to school districts that they should not use classroom time to celebrate Harvey Milk Day or risk losing average daily attendance funds.
The blatant sexual indoctrination of Harvey Milk Day is a clear and present danger for parents. Even school districts in conservative areas are allowing teachers to promote the notorious Harvey Milk:
"If it happens to be in a literature class or a social studies class, it can be included as long as it's related to the topic," [Santa Clarita's William S. Hart Union High School District Spokeswoman Pat] Willett said about teachers including Harvey Milk Day in the curriculum. The bill calls for the day to be observed by public schools as a day of special significance. Teachers will be encouraged to conduct exercises recalling Milk's life and contributions to the state. Willett imagines teachers could include Milk in a discussion of civil rights. Source: Santa Clarita Signal, Oct. 14
Meanwhile, Equality California, California's largest homosexual-bisexual-transsexual political activism group, is planning to develop curriculum to promote Harvey Milk's values in every public school:
The measure was backed by Equality California, the largest gay-rights organization in the state. Geoff Kors, executive director of the group, said it would develop curriculum for schools and teachers to use on Milk's birthday. Source: San Francisco Chronicle, Oct. 13
In response to this blatant attack upon family values and the open promotion of the homosexual-bisexual-transsexual agenda to impressionable children as young as five years old, SaveCalifornia.com is providing the means for parents to take courageous action to rescue their sons and daughters.
"A widespread boycott of Harvey Milk Day will motivate some school boards to create policies prohibiting teachers from commemorating Harvey Milk Day unless first approved by the school district, which is vested with the authority to decide curriculum for local schools," Thomasson said.
"No child is safe from this sky-is-the-limit sexual indoctrination if they are left in the government school system," Thomasson said. "They'll be hit with Harvey Milk Day in May, endure the pro-'LGBT' 'Day of Silence' in April, and, due to pre-existing sexual indoctrination laws, be pressured to support anything-goes heterosexual-homosexual-bisexual-transsexual behavior in health, literature, and social studies."
Before SB 572, "Harvey Milk Day," sexual indoctrination laws have already in been in place, including:
"This is a red alert for parents" said Thomasson. "Your child will be sexually indoctrinated if left in the government-school system. Parents are waking up to the fact that to protect their kids from being sexually brainwashed, they must not only keep them home on Harvey Milk Day, but they must rescue their children by placing them in homeschooling or a solid church school." SaveCalifornia.com has created RescueYourChild.org, which, since January 2008, has been helping parents to exit the imploding government-school system.
For documentation of Harvey Milk taken from the Milk's undisputed biography, The Mayor of Castro Street, by Randy Shilts, and further analysis of SB 572, "Harvey Milk Day," see http://savecalifornia.com/oppose-harvey-milk-gay-day-sb-572.html
-- end --
SaveCalifornia.com is a leading West Coast nonprofit, nonpartisan organization representing children and families. We stand for marriage and family, parental rights, the sanctity of human life, religious freedom, financial freedom, and back-to-basics education.
SaveCalifornia.com
Randy Thomasson, President
P.O. Box 511, Sacramento, CA 95812
(916) 265-5650
www.savecalifornia.com
www.saveamerica.com
I agree with 'more_cops', you certainly have a bias against those who worked hard (something you fail to mention) to achieve their dream of owning a "McMansion" and who by the way pay MORE MONEY IN TAXES for and continue to do so.
You represent a 'belief', and in my opinion your belief should remain personal as the same with being either a Christian or Buddhist. Yes, we have many people living in Manteca that are DECIDING to live here and DECIDING to live on a wage they have chosen. It is NOT our (council) responsibility to help them and is unfair for you to use them as your excuse because they chose to do so. You are a retired city worker and you are treating them as the same, government workers where the citizens should support just like our cops. NO WAY! Your thinking on this is the same as Obama-nomics, costly in the long-run and will cheapen the neighborhoods where these "McMansions" sit thus bringing the values of these properties down and it will eventually suffer the city coffers on those tax revenues. The only way for you to have your dream come true to work would be to bull-doze all those homes down you don't like.
Manteca has chosen and VOTED to have "McMansions" in this city to bring about higher revenue in turn for those who have achieved their success to be able to live in peace, live in a nice neighborhood and live without the crime ridden welfare (Workforce) housing sitting right next to them. They want their children to have a good upbringing less tougher than they did when growing up so they can contribute to society when they become adults, not have to live with the low-life's that chose to live that way and bully them on the streets and tag the streets they live on. Quite frankly, Manteca has gone in the right direction because we know we don't want to become a suburb of Stockton.
Manteca already has enough mixing of housing and plenty of houses already. We also do NOT NEED ANYMORE NEW HOUSING in Manteca. Let's finish the building of what was left and leave it there. The new council should focus on business filling in the vacant lots and buildings just sitting all around town.
It's time for a new Mayor of Manteca and I will not be voting for anyone who has a retirement from this city because your thinking is the same and will remain so, bureaucracy. Your plan also has too much tax remedies in it that will continue to force everyone in Manteca to pay for your big WELFARE HOUSING mistake. That leaves only one other left and as I recall, he too is against this and has mentioned it several times in his 2008 election.
You've had 30 years to bitch about this to the city council and how come you haven't? You're on the Kiwanis club and as a president with Willie, how come you don't have coffee with him about this? If you're that passionate about this, how come you didn't quite your job in protest? There is another city council candidate who has a noise problem with his neighbors and the current city council has done absolutely NOTHING about it and there is a document signed by you that proves you did NOT do your due diligence on it and thus gave a legal document to these people who are conducting an illegal business on their residential property costing the city of Manteca tens of thousands of dollars in tax revenues since your signature on that document June 29, 1993 letter from the City of Manteca signed by Ben Cantu based on unverified information from the lawbreaking owner. http://way2noisy.blogspot.com/2009_02...
Manteca has lost so much money on these people because of this mistake and lazy approach to doing the job right. I'm sure this isn't the last oversight.